Abstract
AbstractComprehension of stories requires readers to take the perspective of the story characters and imagine or feel their cognitive and affective states. The study investigated how variations in emotional valence within a literary text affected readers’ global text processing, as reflected in their eye movements during the first and second-pass reading, and their memory for text. Processes of reading were also examined in relation to readers’ dispositional empathy. Undergraduate students (N = 42) were assigned to an emotionally negative or neutral reading condition. They read a natural text passage from a suspense story while their ocular behavior was registered. After reading, they responded to multiple-choice questions assessing their memory of the text. Results revealed longer first-pass fixation times for content evoking negative emotions than for neutral content, which could be suggestive of a more analytical processing of the former. These effects were however local and did not impact the processing of the text at global level. Memory for the emotionally negative content was more accurate than memory for the neutral content. Dispositional empathy did not contribute to reading processes and outcome. Findings are discussed against the mixed results in the current literature and practical implications are also outlined.
Funder
Spanish National Research Agency
Università degli Studi di Padova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Education,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference58 articles.
1. Albiero, P., Ingoglia, S., & Lo Coco, A. (2006). Contributo all’adattamento italiano dell’Interpersonal reactivity index [Contribution to the Italian adapation of the interpersonal reactivity index]. TPM. Testing Psicometria Metodologia, 13(2), 107–125. [in Italian].
2. Algom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.323
3. Ariasi, N., Hyönä, J., Kaakinen, J., & Mason, L. (2017). An eye-movement analysis of the refutation effect in reading science text. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 202‒221. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12151
4. Bahrick, L. E., Parker, J. F., Fivush, R., & Levitt, M. (1998). The effects of stress on young children’s memory for a natural disaster. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(4), 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.4.4.308
5. Ballenghein, U., Megalakaki, O., & Baccino, T. (2019). Cognitive engagement in emotional text reading: Concurrent recordings of eye movements and head motion. Cognition and Emotion, 33(7), 1448–14460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1574718
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献