Abstract
AbstractRevision plays an important role in writing, and as revisions break down the linearity of the writing process, they are crucial in describing writing process dynamics. Keystroke logging and analysis have been used to identify revisions made during writing. Previous approaches include the manual annotation of revisions, building nonlinear S-notations, and the automated extraction of backspace keypresses. However, these approaches are time-intensive, vulnerable to construct, or restricted. Therefore, this article presents a computational approach to the automatic extraction of full revision events from keystroke logs, including both insertions and deletions, as well as the characters typed to replace the deleted text. Within this approach, revision candidates are first automatically extracted, which allows for a simplified manual annotation of revision events. Second, machine learning is used to automatically detect revision events. For this, 7120 revision events were manually annotated in a dataset of keystrokes obtained from 65 students conducting a writing task. The results showed that revision events could be automatically predicted with a relatively high accuracy. In addition, a case study proved that this approach could be easily applied to a new dataset. To conclude, computational approaches can be beneficial in providing automated insights into revisions in writing.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Education,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference35 articles.
1. Baaijen, V. M., & Galbraith, D. (2018). Discovery through writing: relationships with writing processes and text quality. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1456431
2. Baaijen, V. M., Galbraith, D., & de Glopper, K. (2012). Keystroke analysis: reflections on procedures and measures. Written Communication, 29(3), 246–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451108
3. Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2019). Empowering automated writing evaluation with keystroke logging. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing Writing (Vol. 38, pp. 125–142). Brill.
4. Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., Saricaoglu, A., Torrance, M., & Feng, H. H. (2019). Combined deployable keystroke logging and eyetracking for investigating L2 writing fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 583–604.
5. Conijn, R., Speltz, E. D., van Zaanen, M., Waes, L. V., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2021). A product- and process-oriented tagset for revisions in writing. Written Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211052104.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献