1. Abedi, J., Leon, S., Wolf, M. K., & Farnsworth, T. (2008). Detecting test items differentially impacting the performance of ELL students. In M. K. Wolf, J. L. Herman, J. Kim, J. Abedi, S. Leon, & N. Griffin, et al. (Eds.), Providing validity evidence to improve the assessment of English language learners (pp. 55–75). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
2. Angoff, W. H. (1993). Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 3–23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Apache Software Foundation. (2010). OpenNLP. Retrieved February 13, 2016, from
http://opennlp.apache.org
.
4. Auer, M., Gruber, G., Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2005). SLS 5–8. Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Klassenstufen 5–8 [Salzburger reading screening for grade levels 5–8]. Bern: Huber.
5. Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., Stevens, R., & Lord, C. (2007). Further specifying the language demands of school. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test (pp. 103–156). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.