Abstract
AbstractThis work offers a novel methodological framework to address the problem of generating data-driven earthquake shaking fields at different vibration periods, which are key to support decision making and civil protection planning. We propose to analyse the entire profiles of spectral accelerations and project their information content to unsampled locations in the system, based on the theory of Object Oriented Spatial Statistics. The proposed methodology combines a non-ergodic ground motion model with a fully functional model for the residual term, the latter consisting of (i) the spatially-varying systematic effects due to source, site and path, and (ii) the remaining aleatory error. The proposed methodology allows to generate multiple shaking scenarios conditioned on the data, jointly and consistently for all the vibration periods, overcoming the intrinsic limitations of existing multivariate approaches to the problem. The approach is tested on a vast dataset of ground motion records collected in the study-area of the Po Plain (Northern Italy), for which a region-specific fully non-ergodic GMM was previously calibrated. Our validation tests demonstrate the potentiality of the approach, which is capable to effectively simulate spectral acceleration profiles, while keeping the ability to capture the main physical features of ground motion patterns in the region.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Water Science and Technology,Environmental Chemistry,Environmental Engineering
Reference53 articles.
1. Abrahamsen P, Benth F (2001) Kriging with inequality constraints. Math Geol 33(6):719–744. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011078716252
2. Al-Atik L, Abrahamson N, Bommer J, Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Kuehn N (2010) The variability of ground-motion prediction models and its components. Seismol Res Lett 81(5):794–801
3. Anderson J, Brune J (1999) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis without the ergodic assumption. Seismol Res Lett 70(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.70.1.19
4. Anderson J, Uchiyama Y (2011) A methodology to improve ground-motion prediction equations by including path corrections. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1822–1846. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090359
5. Baltay A, Hanks T, Abrahamson N (2017) Uncertainty, variability, and earthquake physics in ground-motion prediction equations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(4):1754–1772
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献