The token’s secret: the two-faced financial incentive of the token economy

Author:

Drasch Benedict J.ORCID,Fridgen Gilbert,Manner-Romberg Tobias,Nolting Fenja M.,Radszuwill Sven

Abstract

AbstractMulti-sided platforms are omnipresent in today’s digital world. However, establishing a platform includes challenges: The platform utility usually increases with the number of participants. At an early stage, potential participants expect the platform utility to be low and lack an incentive to join (i.e., “chicken and egg” problem). Blockchain-enabled utility tokens hold the promise to overcome this problem. They supposedly provide a suitable financial incentive for their owners to join the platform as soon as possible. In the first half of 2018, investors seemed to believe in the presumption and spent more than US$ 17.6 billion in token sales. To date, we know little about this financial incentive in the context of the token economy. For this purpose, we model the token value development and the associated incentives in a multi-sided blockchain-enabled platform. The resulting findings suggest that blockchain-enabled utility tokens can help to overcome the “chicken and egg” problem. However, these tokens lead to contradictory incentives for platform participants, and can even inhibit platform usage. The contribution of our work is twofold: First, we develop one of the first models for token value development. Second, our research contributes to a deeper understanding of the utility token’s financial incentive.

Funder

Universität Bayreuth

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing,Computer Science Applications,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management

Reference95 articles.

1. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x.

2. Aru, I. (2018). The Fundamental Principles of Utility Tokens in the Blockchain Ecosystem. Retrieved from www.ccn.com/fundamental-principles-utility-tokens-blockchainhttps://www.ccn.com/fundamental-principles-utility-tokens-blockchain-ecosystem/

3. Asanov, P. (2018). Asset-Backed vs. Utility Tokens: Understanding the Pros and Cons. Retrieved from https://medium.com/equitytoken/asset-backed-vs-utility-tokens-understanding-the-pros-and-cons-ca4d1cf41432

4. Bachmann, N., Drasch, B. J., Miksch, M., & Schweizer, A. (2019). Dividing the ICO jungle: Extracting and evaluating design archetypes. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Germany: Siegen.

5. Bakos, Y., & Halaburda, H. (2019). The role of cryptographic tokens and ICOs in fostering platform adoption. CESifo Working Paper(7752). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/201978

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Token Economy Incentive Structure Conceptual Goal Model;2024 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa);2024-05-20

2. Agent-Based Model of Initial Token Allocations: Simulating Distributions post Fair Launch;ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems;2024-03-23

3. Designing a Blockchain-Based Data Market and Pricing Data to Optimize Data Trading and Welfare;International Journal of Electronic Commerce;2024-01-02

4. A design for tokenization in governmental investment;International Journal of Accounting & Information Management;2023-12-01

5. Gamified cryptocurrency and rewards: Consumer behaviour during uncertain earnings;Journal of Consumer Behaviour;2023-11-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3