Abstract
AbstractThis paper examines the legal status of micronations claiming virtual sovereignty in cyberspace, using the case of the Republic of Errant Menda Lerenda (REML) as an example. The REML is a micronation that claims to have virtual sovereignty over a network of individuals who share its values and beliefs. Through an in-depth analysis of existing literature and sources, this paper explores the legal implications of virtual sovereignty and the challenges that micronations face in establishing legitimacy in the international community. The paper concludes that while the lack of recognition of virtual states by the international community limits their ability to engage in formal relations with other states, virtual sovereignty raises important questions about the concept of statehood in the digital age. This paper suggests that further research is needed to explore the legal and practical implications of virtual sovereignty and to develop new frameworks for determining the legitimacy of virtual states.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Corn, G. P., & Taylor, R. (2017). Sovereignty in the age of cyber. American Journal of International Law, 111, 207–212.
2. Crawford, J. (2007). Statehood and recognition. In The creation of states in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford.
3. DeNardis, L. (2009). Protocol politics: The globalization of Internet governance. MIT Press.
4. Dennis, T. A. (2002). The principality of Sealand: Nation building by individuals. Tulsa J. Comp. & Int’l L., 10, 261.
5. Dinstein, Y. (2017). War, aggression, and self-defense (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.