A gifted SNARC? Directional spatial–numerical associations in gifted children with high-level math skills do not differ from controls
-
Published:2020-05-24
Issue:4
Volume:85
Page:1645-1661
-
ISSN:0340-0727
-
Container-title:Psychological Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Psychological Research
Author:
He Yunfeng, Nuerk Hans- Christoph, Derksen Alexander, Shi Jiannong, Zhou Xinlin, Cipora KrzysztofORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe SNARC (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes) effect (i.e., a tendency to associate small/large magnitude numbers with the left/right hand side) is prevalent across the whole lifespan. Because the ability to relate numbers to space has been viewed as a cornerstone in the development of mathematical skills, the relationship between the SNARC effect and math skills has been frequently examined. The results remain largely inconsistent. Studies testing groups of people with very low or very high skill levels in math sometimes found relationships between SNARC and math skills. So far, however, studies testing such extreme math skills level groups were mostly investigating the SNARC effect in individuals revealing math difficulties. Groups with above average math skills remain understudied, especially in regard to children. Here, we investigate the SNARC effect in gifted children, as compared to normally developing children (overall n = 165). Frequentist and Bayesian analysis suggested that the groups did not differ from each other in the SNARC effect. These results are the first to provide evidence for the SNARC effect in a relatively large sample of gifted (and mathematically highly skilled) children. In sum, our study provides another piece of evidence for no direct link between the SNARC effect and mathematical ability in childhood.
Funder
Science and Technology Agency of Liaoning
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine
Reference108 articles.
1. Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13(3), 263–308. 2. Bachot, J., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Roeyers, H. (2005). Number sense in children with visuospatial disabilities: orientation of the mental number line. Psychological Science, 47(1), 172–183. 3. Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., & Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74(4), 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2518. 4. Bonato, M., Fabbri, S., Umilta, C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). The mental representation of numerical fractions: real or integer? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1410–1419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1410. 5. Brozzoli, C., Ishihara, M., Göbel, S. M., Salemme, R., Rossetti, Y., & Farnè, A. (2008). Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(14), 5644–5648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708414105.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|