Abstract
AbstractDeliberate attempts to portray oneself in an unrealistic manner are commonly encountered in the administration of personality questionnaires. The main aim of the present study was to explore whether mouse tracking temporal indicators and machine learning models could improve the detection of subjects implementing a faking-good response style when answering personality inventories with four choice alternatives, with and without time pressure. A total of 120 volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups and asked to respond to the Virtuous Responding (VR) validity scale of the PPI-R and the Positive Impression Management (PIM) validity scale of the PAI via a computer mouse. A mixed design was implemented, and predictive models were calculated. The results showed that, on the PIM scale, faking-good participants were significantly slower in responding than honest respondents. Relative to VR items, PIM items are shorter in length and feature no negations. Accordingly, the PIM scale was found to be more sensitive in distinguishing between honest and faking-good respondents, demonstrating high classification accuracy (80–83%).
Funder
Università degli Studi di Padova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine
Reference79 articles.
1. Baer, R. A., & Miller, J. (2002). Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI-2: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 16–26.
2. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). Empirical correlates of the MMPI–2 restructured clinical (RC) scales in mental health, forensic, and nonclinical settings: An introduction. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 119–121.
3. Bosco, A., et al. (2020). Detecting faking good in military enlistment procedure according to a new index for the MMPI-2. Italian Journal of Criminology, 14(2), 99–109.
4. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forest. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.
5. Burla, F., et al. (2019). Use of the parents preference test in child custody evaluations: Preliminary development of conforming parenting index. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 7(3), 1–17.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献