Estimating Juvenile Salmon Estuarine Carrying Capacities to Support Restoration Planning and Evaluation
-
Published:2023-02-27
Issue:4
Volume:46
Page:1046-1066
-
ISSN:1559-2723
-
Container-title:Estuaries and Coasts
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Estuaries and Coasts
Author:
Hall JasonORCID, Roni Phil, Ross Kai, Camp Meghan J., Nuckols Jason, Ruffing Claire
Abstract
AbstractEstimating juvenile salmon habitat carrying capacities is a critical need for restoration planning. We assimilated more than 4500 unique estimates of published juvenile densities (e.g., fish/m2) in estuarine and floodplain habitats. These density data were categorized by species and life stage, habitat type, seasonal period, and geographic region to develop frequency statistics (e.g., 25th and 75th percentiles, or quartiles). These frequency statistics were then used in a habitat expansion approach to estimate carrying capacities based on habitat extent. We demonstrate the habitat expansion approach by applying the quantiles of observed juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and coho salmon (O. kisutch) densities (fish/ha) to spatial data describing current, historical or potential, and predicted (based on seal level rise) habitat extents for 16 coastal Oregon estuaries to estimate carrying capacities. Current carrying capacities based on 75th percentile springtime (Apr–Jun) densities ranged from 2902 to 33,817 fish/delta for Chinook salmon and 2507 to 20,206 fish/delta for coho salmon. Historic carrying capacities during the peak rearing period (spring) ranged from 3869 to 71,844 fish/delta for Chinook salmon and 3201 to 38,337 fish/delta for coho salmon, representing a 3 to 72% loss in Chinook salmon capacity and 2 to 67% loss in coho salmon capacity. Estimated carrying capacities were predicted to decline by 2 to 54% with 1.4 m of sea level rise in systems that are projected to lose vegetated tidal wetland habitat, while a 1 to 320% increase in capacity was predicted for systems that are predicted to increase in area with sea level rise. Finally, we demonstrate how the carrying capacity estimates can be used to estimate changes in juvenile Chinook and coho salmon capacity following restoration, which can be used to both design and evaluate restoration projects.
Funder
Nature Conservancy Northwest Fisheries Science Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference58 articles.
1. Apgar, T.M., J.E. Merz, B.T. Martin, and E.P. Palkovacs. 2020. Alternative migratory strategies are widespread in subyearling Chinook salmon. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 30 (1): 125–139. 2. Baker, M., A. Domanski, T. Hollweg, J. Murray, D. Lane, K. Skrabis, R. Taylor, T. Moore, and L. DiPinto. 2020. Restoration scaling approaches to addressing ecological injury: The habitat-based resource equivalency method. Environmental Management 65: 161–177. 3. Beamer, E., A. McBride, C. Greene, R. Henderson, G. Hood, K. Wolf, K. Larsen, C. Rice, and K. Fresh. 2005. Delta and nearshore restoration for the recovery of wild Skagit River Chinook salmon: linking estuary restoration to wild Chinook salmon populations. Skagit Chinook Recovery Plan, Skagit River System Cooperative Research Program, LaConner, Washington. 4. Beechie, T.J., C. Fogel, C. Nicol, and G.R. Pess. 2018. Monitoring large river, floodplain, and delta habitat status and trends in the Oregon coast coho evolutionarily significant Unit: FY 2018 progress report. NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, Washington. 5. Beechie, T., H. Imaki, J. Greene, A. Wade, H. Wu, G. Pess, P. Roni, J. Kimball, J. Stanford, P. Kiffney, and N. Mantua. 2013. Restoring salmon habitat for a changing climate. River Research and Applications 29: 1535–1467.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|