Abstract
AbstractNatural resource trustee agencies must determine how much, and what type of environmental restoration will compensate for injuries to natural resources that result from releases of hazardous substances or oil spills. To fulfill this need, trustees, and other natural resource damage assessment (NRDA) practitioners have relied on a variety of approaches, including habitat equivalency analysis (HEA) and resource equivalency analysis (REA). The purpose of this paper is to introduce the Habitat-Based Resource Equivalency Method (HaBREM), which integrates REA’s reproducible injury metrics and population modeling with HEA’s comprehensive habitat approach to restoration. HaBREM is intended to evaluate injury and restoration using organisms that use the habitat to represent ecological habitat functions. This paper seeks to expand and refine the use of organism-based metrics (biomass-based REA), providing an opportunity to integrate sublethal injuries to multiple species, as well as the potential to include error rates for injury and restoration parameters. Applied by NRDA practitioners in the appropriate context, this methodology can establish the relationship between benefits of compensatory restoration projects and injuries to plant or animal species within an affected habitat. HaBREM may be most effective where there are appropriate data supporting the linkage between habitat and species gains (particularly regionally specific habitat information), as well as species-specific monitoring data and predictions on the growth, density, productivity (i.e., rate of generation of biomass or individuals), and age distributions of indicator species.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pollution,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference45 articles.
1. Adamowicz WL, Boxall PC, Louviere JJ, Swait J, Williams M (2001) Stated-preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. In: Bateman I, Willis K (eds) Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 460–479
2. Ando A, Madhu K, Wildermuth A, Vig S (2004) Natural resource damage assessments: methods and cases. Waste Management and Research Center, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Champaign IL. RR-108. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/1979/RR-108.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 29 Apr 2019
3. Brusati ED, DuBowy PJ, Lacher TE (2001) Comparing ecological functions of natural and created wetlands for shorebirds in Texas. Waterbirds 24(3):371–380
4. Cacela D, Lipton J, Beltman D, Hansen J, Wolotira R (2005) Associating ecosystem service losses with indicators of toxicity in habitat equivalency analysis. Environ Manag 35(3):343–351
5. Champ PA, Boyle K, Brown TC (2017) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献