Abstract
AbstractLock-in is defined as the tendency to continue with an inefficient decision or project proposal. The front-end phase is critical to project success, yet most studies have focused on lock-in in the implementation phase. Moreover, little is known about the way in which decision-makers perceive the risk of lock-in. In this paper we identify determinants of lock-in in the front-end phase and we reveal decision-makers’ perceptions of risk of lock-in. Our findings show that risk attitudes towards lock-in vary with the level of risk aversion. However, this is not sufficiently acute to drive the level of regret needed to avoid lock-in. This implies that decision-makers do not accurately assess the risk of lock-in and as such their risk perceptions are a mediating factor in the formation of lock-in. Based on escalation of commitment, path dependency, and prospect theory, the main contribution lies in providing a more comprehensive understanding of lock-in in the front-end phase.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Transportation,Development,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference102 articles.
1. Aaltonen, K., Ahola, T., Artto, K.: Something old, something new: path dependence and path creation during the early stage of a project. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35(5), 749–762 (2017)
2. Addams, H.: Q methodology. In: Addams, H., Proops, J. (eds.) Social Discourse and Environmental Policy. An Application of Q Methodology, pp. 14–40. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2000)
3. Arkes, H.R., Blumer, C.: The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 35(1), 124–140 (1985)
4. Barry, J., Proops, J.: Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol. Econ. 28(3), 337–345 (1999)
5. Bowen, M.G.: The escalation phenomenon reconsidered: decision dilemmas or decision errors? Acad. Manag. Rev. 12(1), 52–68 (1987)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献