Abstract
AbstractThis paper reflects my address as IAAIL president at ICAIL 2021. It is aimed to give my vision of the status of the AI and Law discipline, and possible future perspectives. In this respect, I go through different seasons of AI research (of AI and Law in particular): from the Winter of AI, namely a period of mistrust in AI (throughout the eighties until early nineties), to the Summer of AI, namely the current period of great interest in the discipline with lots of expectations. One of the results of the first decades of AI research is that “intelligence requires knowledge”. Since its inception the Web proved to be an extraordinary vehicle for knowledge creation and sharing, therefore it’s not a surprise if the evolution of AI has followed the evolution of the Web. I argue that a bottom-up approach, in terms of machine/deep learning and NLP to extract knowledge from raw data, combined with a top-down approach, in terms of legal knowledge representation and models for legal reasoning and argumentation, may represent a promotion for the development of the Semantic Web, as well as of AI systems. Finally, I provide my insight in the potential of AI development, which takes into account technological opportunities and theoretical limits.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Artificial Intelligence
Reference75 articles.
1. Agnoloni T, Bacci L, Francesconi E, Spinosa P, Tiscornia D, Montemagni S, Venturi G (2007) Building an ontological support for multilingual legislative drafting In: Proceedings of the Jurix Conference, pp 9–18
2. Aleven V, Ashley K (1997) Evaluating a learning environment for case-based argumentation skills In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law pp 170–179 ACM Press
3. Antoniou G, Dimaresis N, Governatori G (2008) A system for modal and deontic defeasible reasoning In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing pp 2261–2265 ACM https://doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1364226
4. Ashley K (1991) Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in hypo Int J Man Mach Stud 753–796
5. Ashley K (2011) the case-based reasoning approach ontologies for analogical legal argument. In: Sartor G, Casanovas P, Biasiotti M, Fernández-Barrera M (eds) Approaches to legal: ontologies law governance and technology series. Springer, Dordrecht
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献