Abstract
AbstractDeveloped in the 1980s by social anthropologists, education researchers and psychologists, the field of research known as (New) Literacy Studies (NLS) has put forward a sociocultural understanding of literacy as practice. Although the NLS’ core assumption about literacy—that it is more than a set of cognitive abilities—is still as valid nowadays as it was then, new theoretical ideas have been added to their canon. These include multiliteracies, multimodality, real literacies, materiality and affect. With these notions, literacy researchers continue to challenge conventional discourses about literacy and their disregard for the range of literacy practices people engage in. In this paper, I introduce some of these new theoretical developments. I then discuss their conceptual relevance in the context of two action research projects with deaf children and youth in India, Uganda and Ghana. In these projects, my colleagues and I tried an approach to teaching English to deaf children and young adults that was specifically inspired by ideas from real literacies and multiliteracies. Our approach was shaped by the NLS’ commitment to social justice and its belief in literacy teaching having to build on students’ existing literacy practices. In the paper, I discuss some of the challenges we experienced when putting these ideas into practice and look at how the students engaged with them in light of their expectations and desires for learning.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Akanglig-Pare, George, Anthony Mugeere, Rajani Ranjan Singh, Rajani Ranjan, and Ulrike Zeshan. 2021. Disadvantage and marginalisation in special education systems for deaf students in India, Ghana, and Uganda: a comparative analysis. In Read, Write, Easy: Research, practice and innovation in deaf multiliteracies, Vol. 2, ed. Jennifer Webster, Ulrike Zeshan, 119–173. Lancaster: Ishara Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/51600.
2. Barton, David. 2007. Literacy: an introduction to the ecology of written language, 2nd edn., Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Brandt, Deborah, and Katie Clinton. 2002. Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research 34(3):337–356.
4. Burnett, Cathy, and Guy Merchant. 2020. Returning to text: affect, meaning making, and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly 56(2):355–367.
5. Burnett, Cathy, Guy Merchant, and Michelle M. Neumann. 2020. Closing the gap? Overcoming limitations in sociomaterial accounts of early literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 20(1):111–133.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献