The (New) Literacy Studies: The evolving concept of literacy as social practice and its relevance for work with deaf students

Author:

Papen Uta

Abstract

AbstractDeveloped in the 1980s by social anthropologists, education researchers and psychologists, the field of research known as (New) Literacy Studies (NLS) has put forward a sociocultural understanding of literacy as practice. Although the NLS’ core assumption about literacy—that it is more than a set of cognitive abilities—is still as valid nowadays as it was then, new theoretical ideas have been added to their canon. These include multiliteracies, multimodality, real literacies, materiality and affect. With these notions, literacy researchers continue to challenge conventional discourses about literacy and their disregard for the range of literacy practices people engage in. In this paper, I introduce some of these new theoretical developments. I then discuss their conceptual relevance in the context of two action research projects with deaf children and youth in India, Uganda and Ghana. In these projects, my colleagues and I tried an approach to teaching English to deaf children and young adults that was specifically inspired by ideas from real literacies and multiliteracies. Our approach was shaped by the NLS’ commitment to social justice and its belief in literacy teaching having to build on students’ existing literacy practices. In the paper, I discuss some of the challenges we experienced when putting these ideas into practice and look at how the students engaged with them in light of their expectations and desires for learning.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Akanglig-Pare, George, Anthony Mugeere, Rajani Ranjan Singh, Rajani Ranjan, and Ulrike Zeshan. 2021. Disadvantage and marginalisation in special education systems for deaf students in India, Ghana, and Uganda: a comparative analysis. In Read, Write, Easy: Research, practice and innovation in deaf multiliteracies, Vol. 2, ed. Jennifer Webster, Ulrike Zeshan, 119–173. Lancaster: Ishara Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/51600.

2. Barton, David. 2007. Literacy: an introduction to the ecology of written language, 2nd edn., Oxford: Blackwell.

3. Brandt, Deborah, and Katie Clinton. 2002. Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research 34(3):337–356.

4. Burnett, Cathy, and Guy Merchant. 2020. Returning to text: affect, meaning making, and literacies. Reading Research Quarterly 56(2):355–367.

5. Burnett, Cathy, Guy Merchant, and Michelle M. Neumann. 2020. Closing the gap? Overcoming limitations in sociomaterial accounts of early literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 20(1):111–133.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3