We do not measure what we aim to measure: Testing Three Measurement Models for Nationalism and Patriotism

Author:

Mußotter MarleneORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe measurement models for both nationalism and patriotism originally developed by Blank and Schmidt are broadly established. Despite their widespread usage in Germany and beyond, concerns have been voiced about the operationalisation of these nation-related concepts. However, in previous scholarship little attention has been devoted to systematically reviewing the models’ validity. This paper’s major goal is to contribute substantially to research on operationalising national attitudes by thoroughly examining how both nationalism and patriotism are measured and how valid the predominant measurement models really are. By running a confirmatory factor analysis, three measurement models based on the ISSP data of 2003 are replicated and empirically reviewed. By conducting a single-country analysis, the models are tested for the German case, including the evaluation of measurement invariance for both Eastern and Western Germany. Although the selected measurement models yield satisfying results, the paper identifies considerable shortcomings with regard to the way both nationalism and patriotism are empirically approached. It calls for a reconceptualising of the prevailing concept of pride and thus challenges the predominant operationalisation.

Funder

Universität Passau

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Statistics and Probability

Reference92 articles.

1. Ariely, G.: Constitutional patriotism, liberal nationalism and membership in the nation: An empirical assessment. Acta Polit. 46(3), 294–319 (2011)

2. Assmann, A.: Die Wiedererfindung der Nation. Warum wir sie fürchten und warum wir sie brauchen. C.H. Beck, München (2020)

3. Bergsieker, H.: National pride and prejudice: The case of Germany. In: Karolewski, I., Suszycki, A. (eds.) Multiplicity of Nationalism in Contemporary Europe, pp. 151–174. Lexington Books, Lanham (2010)

4. Ben-Porath, S.: Civic virtue out of necessity: Patriotism and democratic education. Theory Res. Educ. 5(1), 41–59

5. Billig, M.: Banal Nationalism. SAGE, London (1995)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3