Abstract
AbstractUncertainties are essential, yet often neglected, information for evaluating the reliability in forest carbon balance projections used in national and regional policy planning. We analysed uncertainties in the forest net biome exchange (NBE) and carbon stocks under multiple management and climate scenarios with a process-based ecosystem model. Sampled forest initial state values, model parameters, harvest levels and global climate models (GCMs) served as inputs in Monte Carlo simulations, which covered forests of the 18 regions of mainland Finland over the period 2015–2050. Under individual scenarios, the results revealed time- and region-dependent variability in the magnitude of uncertainty and mean values of the NBE projections. The main sources of uncertainty varied with time, by region and by the amount of harvested wood. Combinations of uncertainties in the representative concentration pathways scenarios, GCMs, forest initial values and model parameters were the main sources of uncertainty at the beginning, while the harvest scenarios dominated by the end of the simulation period, combined with GCMs and climate scenarios especially in the north. Our regionally explicit uncertainty analysis was found a useful approach to reveal the variability in the regional potentials to reach a policy related, future target level of NBE, which is important information when planning realistic and regionally fair national policy actions.
Funder
Strategic Research Council
Academy of Finland
Horizon 2020
Finnish Ministry of the Environment
BiodivERsA
Finnish Environment Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Geography, Planning and Development,General Medicine
Reference53 articles.
1. Aalto, J., P. Pirinen, J. Heikkinen, and A. Venäläinen. 2013. Spatial interpolation of monthly climate data for Finland: Comparing the performance of kriging and generalized additive models. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 112: 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0716-9.
2. Äijälä, O., A. Koistinen, J. Sved, K. Vanhatalo, and P. Väisänen. 2019. Metsänhoidon suositukset. (In Finnish). Tapion julkaisuja. https://tapio.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Metsanhoidon_suositukset_Tapio_2019.pdf
3. Akujärvi, A., A. Shvidenko, and S.A. Pietsch. 2019. Modelling the impacts of intensifying forest management on carbon budget across a long latitudinal gradient in Europe. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf766.
4. Anderegg, W.R.L., C. Wu, N. Acil, N. Carvalhais, T.A.M. Pugh, J.P. Sadler, and R. Seidl. 2022. A climate risk analysis of earth’s forests in the 21st century. Science 377: 1099–1103. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9723.
5. Blattert, C., M. Mönkkönen, D. Burgas, F.D. Fulvio, A.T. Caicoya, M. Vergarechea, J. Klein, M. Hartikainen, et al. 2023. Climate targets in European timber-producing countries conflict with goals on forest ecosystem services and biodiversity. Communications Earth & Environment 4: 119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00771-z.