The utility of the implementation science framework “Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services” (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department
-
Published:2020-10-21
Issue:11
Volume:30
Page:3063-3071
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Roberts Natasha A.,Janda Monika,Stover Angela M.,Alexander Kimberly E.,Wyld David,Mudge Alison,
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
We evaluated the utility of the implementation science framework “Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services” (i-PARIHS) for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into a medical oncology outpatient department. The i-PARIHS framework identifies four core constructs for implementation, including Facilitation, Innovation, Context and Recipients.
Methods
A pilot study used the i-PARIHS framework to identify PROM implementation barriers and enablers to inform facilitation support strategies, such as training clinicians and staff, workflow support, technical support and audit and feedback. Pre- and post-implementation surveys were completed by 83 and 72 staff, respectively, (nurses, doctors and allied health), to assess perceived knowledge, enablers, barriers and utility of PROMs; and acceptability of the PROM intervention was also assessed post-implementation.
Results
Important barriers included time constraints and previous experiences with technology. Enablers included good leadership support and a culture of learning. Facilitation strategies were used to overcome barriers identified in the i-PARIHS core domains. Compared to before the intervention, staff surveys showed improvement in perceived usefulness, perceived understanding and interpretation skills for PROMs. Staff perceptions about lack of time to use PROMs during visits remained a major perceived barrier post-implementation.
Conclusion
The i-PARIHS framework was useful for guiding the implementation of PROMs in routine oncology care. The four core i-PARIHS constructs (Facilitation, Innovation, Context and Recipients) identified factors that directly impacted implementation, with Facilitation having a particularly important role to overcome these barriers. Oncology clinics and health systems considering implementing PROMs should consider having a dedicated Facilitator available during PROM implementation.
Funder
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation Queensland University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference49 articles.
1. Basch, E. B., Deal, A. M., Kris, M. G., Scher, H. I., Hudis, C. A., Sabbatini, P., et al. (2016). Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(6), 557–565. 2. Denis, F., Lethrosne, C., Pourel, N., Molinier, O., Pointreau, Y., Domont, J., et al. (2017). Randomized trial comparing a web-mediated follow-up with routine surveillance in lung cancer patients. Journal National Cancer Institute, 109(9), 1–8. 3. Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., & Selby, P. J. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–723. 4. Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration Policy Mental Health, 38, 65–76. 5. Stover, A. M., Stricker, C. T., Hammelef, K., Henson, S., Carr, P., Jansen, J., et al. (2019). Using stakeholder engagement to overcome barriers to implementing Patient- Reported Outcomes (PROs) in cancer care delivery: Approaches from three prospective studies. “PRO-Cision” Medicine Toolkit. Medical Care, 55(7), S92–S97.
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|