Measuring Quality of Life in Routine Oncology Practice Improves Communication and Patient Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Velikova Galina1,Booth Laura1,Smith Adam B.1,Brown Paul M.1,Lynch Pamela1,Brown Julia M.1,Selby Peter J.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre-Leeds, Cancer Medicine Research Unit, St James's University Hospital; and Northern and Yorkshire Clinical Trials and Research Unit, Leeds, United Kingdom

Abstract

Purpose To examine the effects on process of care and patient well-being, of the regular collection and use of health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) data in oncology practice. Patients and Methods In a prospective study with repeated measures involving 28 oncologists, 286 cancer patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (regular completion of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Core Quality of Life Questionnaire version 3.0, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale on touch-screen computers in clinic and feedback of results to physicians); attention-control group (completion of questionnaires, but no feedback); or control group (no HRQL measurement in clinic before encounters). Primary outcomes were patient HRQL over time, measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire, physician-patient communication, and clinical management, measured by content analysis of tape-recorded encounters. Analysis employed mixed-effects modeling and multiple regression. Results Patients in the intervention and attention-control groups had better HRQL than the control group (P = .006 and P = .01, respectively), but the intervention and attention-control groups were not significantly different (P = .80). A positive effect on emotional well-being was associated with feedback of data (P = .008), but not with instrument completion (P = .12). A larger proportion of intervention patients showed clinically meaningful improvement in HRQL. More frequent discussion of chronic nonspecific symptoms (P = .03) was found in the intervention group, without prolonging encounters. There was no detectable effect on patient management (P = .60). In the intervention patients, HRQL improvement was associated with explicit use of HRQL data (P = .016), discussion of pain, and role function (P = .046). Conclusion Routine assessment of cancer patients' HRQL had an impact on physician-patient communication and resulted in benefits for some patients, who had better HRQL and emotional functioning.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference33 articles.

1. The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine

2. Greenfield S, Nelson EC: Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care 30:23,1992–41, (suppl 5)

3. McWhinney I: The need for a transformed clinical method, in Stewart M, Roter D (eds): Communicating with Medical Patients . Newbury Park, UK, SAGE Publications, pp 25,1989–40

4. Cancer's Psychological Challenges

5. NCCN practice guidelines for the management of psychosocial distress: National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Oncology (Huntingt) 13:113,1999–147,

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3