Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Supporting the capture and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at the point-of-care enriches information about important clinical and quality of life outcomes. Yet the ability to scale PROs across healthcare systems has been limited by knowledge gaps around how to manage the diversity of PRO uses and leverage health information technology. In this study, we report learnings and practice insights from UW Medicine’s practice transformation efforts to incorporate patient voice into multiple areas of care.
Methods
Using a participatory, action research approach, we engaged with UW Medicine clinical and administrative stakeholders experienced with PRO implementation to inventory PRO implementations across the health system, characterize common clinical uses for PROs, and develop recommendations for system-wide governance and implementation of PROs.
Results
We identified a wide breadth of PRO implementations (n = 14) in practice and found that nearly half (47%) of employed PRO measures captured shared clinical domains (e.g., depression). We developed three vignettes (use cases) that illustrate how users interact with PROs, characterize common ways PRO implementations support clinical care across the health system (1) Preventive care, (2) Chronic/Specialty care, and (3) Surgical/Interventional care), and elucidate opportunities to enhance efficient PRO implementations through system-level standards and governance.
Conclusions
Practice transformation efforts increasingly require integration of the patient voice into clinical care, often through the use of PROs. Learnings from our work highlight the importance of proactively considering how PROs will be used across the layers of healthcare organizations to optimize the design and governance of PROs.
Funder
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference47 articles.
1. Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L. (2011). The values and value of patient-centered care. The Annals of Family Medicine,9(2), 100–103.
2. Snyder, C. F., Wu, A. W., Miller, R. S., Jensen, R. E., Bantug, E. T., & Wolff, A. C. (2011). The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care. Cancer Journal,17(4), 211–218.
3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2019). Person and Family Engagement Strategy, 2018. Retrieved August 20, 2019, from
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityInitiativesGenInfo/Person-and-Family-Engagement.html
.
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2019). Promoting interoperability.
5. National Quality Forum. (2018). NQF: Patient-reported outcomes. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from
https://www.qualityforum.org/Patient-Reported_Outcomes.aspx
.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献