Abstract
Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to determine the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) score ranges associated with descriptive labels (i.e., within normal limits, mild, moderate, severe) by using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients who have experienced a bone fracture.
Study design and setting
We created vignettes comprised of six items and responses from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Function, Physical Function, and Pain Interference item banks reflecting different levels of severity. Two groups of patients with fractures (n = 11) and two groups of orthopedic clinicians (n = 16) reviewed the vignettes and assigned descriptive labels independently and then discussed as a group until reaching consensus via a videoconference platform.
Results
PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference thresholds (T = 50, 40, 25/30 and T = 50/55, 60, 65/70, respectively) for patients with bone fractures were consistent with the results from other patient populations. Upper Extremity thresholds were about 10 points (1 SD) more severe (T = 40, 30, 25/20) compared to the other measures. Patient and clinician perspectives were similar.
Conclusion
Bookmarking methods generated meaningful score thresholds for PROMIS measures. These thresholds between severity categories varied by domain. Threshold values for severity represent important supplemental information to interpret PROMIS scores clinically.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference26 articles.
1. Rolfson, O., Bohm, E., Franklin, P., et al. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis. Acta Orthopaedica, 87(Suppl 1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. published Online First: 2016/05/27.
2. Siljander, M. P., McQuivey, K. S., Fahs, A. M., et al. (2018). Current trends in patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: A study of 4 major orthopaedic journals. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 33(11), 3416–3421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.034
3. Mou, D., Sisodia, R. C., Castillo-Angeles, M., et al. (2022). The surgeon’s perceived value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): An exploratory qualitative study of 5 different surgical subspecialties. Annals of Surgery, 275(3), 500–505.
4. Makhni, E. C. (2021). Meaningful clinical applications of patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedics. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 103(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.20.00624. published Online First: 2020/10/21.
5. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. (2022). Comprehensive care for joint replacement model. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Retrieved January 9, 2022, from https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models/cjr
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献