Environmental and economic sustainability in public contexts: the impact of hand-drying options on waste management, carbon emissions and operating costs
-
Published:2021-01-18
Issue:8
Volume:23
Page:11279-11296
-
ISSN:1387-585X
-
Container-title:Environment, Development and Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Dev Sustain
Author:
Coller Graziano, Schiavon MarcoORCID, Ragazzi Marco
Abstract
AbstractDue to the high density of users hosted everyday, public buildings are important producers of waste and emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Public restrooms play an underrated role in waste generation and GHG emissions, especially if paper towels are used as the hand-drying method. The choice of the hand-drying method (i.e., paper towels vs. electrical hand dryers) also affects the economic balance of a public institution, involving costs for the purchase of hand-drying materials/apparatuses, energy and waste disposal. The present paper aims at evaluating the economic and environmental impact of the introduction of electrical hand dryers (alternative scenario) in place of paper towels (reference scenario) in a public building. The paper presents a solid methodology, based on a numerical experiment approach, to identify a decision criterion for establishing the economical convenience of adopting the alternative scenario in public restrooms. Key factors affecting the choice between the proposed alternatives are presented and discussed in a dedicated sensitivity analysis. From the environmental point of view, this study evaluates the impact of each scenario in terms of GHG emissions, related to multiple waste treatment options and different electric grid mixes. Based on the experimental assumptions, the method allowed concluding that the alternative scenario becomes economically convenient when the number of daily usages (N) is > 57 ± 4. The environmental convenience of the alternative scenario is visible even at N < 10. The method here described can be successfully used to support strategic decisions for cost optimization and environmental mitigation in institutional buildings.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Trento
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference50 articles.
1. Abdelaal, A. H., McKay, G., & Mackey, H. R. (2019). Food waste from a university campus in the Middle East: Drivers, composition, and resource recovery potential. Waste Management, 98, 14–20. 2. Ahmad, W., Soskolne, C. L., & Ahmed, T. (2012). Strategic thinking on sustainability: Challenges and sectoral roles. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14, 67–83. 3. AlNuaimi, B. K., & Khan, M. (2019). Public-sector green procurement in the United Arab Emirates: Innovation capability and commitment to change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 482–489. 4. Anderson, J. L., Warren, C. A., Perez, E., Louis, R. I., Phillips, S., Wheeler, J., et al. (2008). Gender and ethnic differences in hand hygiene practices among college students. American Journal of Infection Control, 36, 361–368. 5. Asimakopoulos, D. A., Santamouris, M., Farrou, I., Laskari, M., Saliari, M., Zanis, G., et al. (2012). Modelling the energy demand projection of the building sector in Greece in the 21st century. Energy and Buildings, 49, 488–498.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|