Abstract
AbstractInsights into how university teachers develop their teaching can strengthen the effectiveness of professional learning activities. Professional learning initiatives aim to support teachers in developing a teaching profile that is focused on student learning. However, university teachers often report a combination of content- and student-focused approaches to teaching and are not systematically focused on the learning outcomes of students. Teacher development theories hypothesise teaching growth as a hierarchy in which the development of more-complex skills (student-centred teaching) is based on the easier ones. This cumulative development of university teachers’ teaching has not yet been examined in authentic learning environments. We explored whether the hierarchy can also be found in observed teaching behaviour. Rasch analysis of 203 classroom observations revealed a stage-wise ordering of the teaching skills from basic to complex, consistent with the theorised development of teaching in the literature. University teachers develop from teacher-centred to student-centred teaching by increasingly acknowledging the student in the teaching and learning process. At the same time, they aim first to gain comfort in a stage (self-focused) before improving their teaching in that development stage (focus on task). As teachers develop, they move on to student-learning focused skills, such as teaching–learning strategies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication,Education
Reference52 articles.
1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher-variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 375.
2. Andrews, T. C., Auerback, A. J. J., & Grant, E. F. (2019). Exploring the relationship between teacher knowledge and active-learning implementation in large college biology courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(48), 1–17.
3. Andrich, D., & Marais, I. (2019). A course in Rasch measurement theory. Singapore: Springer.
4. Barnett, R., & Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2017). Sighting horizons of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 73(1), 113–126.
5. Bergh, D. (2015). Chi squared test of fit and sample size: A comparison between a random sample approach and a Chi square value adjustment period. Journal of Applied Measurement, 16(2), 204–217.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献