1. Abell, M., & Lewis, P. (2005). Universal design for learning: A statewide improvement model for academic success. Information Technology and Disabilities Journal, 11(1), 8–15. Retrieved February 17, 2009, from http://people.rit.edu/easi/itd/itdv11n1/abell.htm .
2. Anderman, L. H., & Midgley, C. (1997). Motivation and middle school students. In J. L. Irvin (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 41–48). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
3. Bahr, C., Kinzer, C., & Rieth, H. (1991). An analysis of the effects of teacher training and student grouping on reading comprehension skills among mildly handicapped high school students using computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11(3), 136–154.
4. Biggs, J. B. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3–19.
5. Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.