Author:
Engelbertink Monique M. J.,Kelders Saskia M.,Woudt-Mittendorff Kariene M.,Westerhof Gerben J.
Abstract
AbstractWhereas blended learning can deliver several benefits to students in higher education, their achievement depends on how exactly it is designed. A participatory design is recommendable to try to meet the needs of all stakeholders. The Persuasive System Design-model can be used to motivate students during the online part of the course. In the design there has to be an optimal blend between the different parts of the course. A participatory design is used to design a blended learning course of autobiographical reflection for second year social work students. The blended course was developed in six meetings with a working group, including all stakeholders (students, teachers, instructional designers, educational experts and professionals). Almost all techniques of the first three categories of the PSD-model were used in the design of the blended course. None of the techniques of the fourth category ‘Social Support’ of the PSD-model were used, mostly because they touch on the personal process of autobiographical reflection. It was considered helpful for teachers to have a protocol that assists them in blending the different parts and this in turn could stimulate students to be engaged in the different parts of the blended learning course. In this study, we found that the participatory design approach may lead to an engaging blended learning course that encourages the use of persuasive technology with an optimal focus on content, target group, context and ethical aspects of the blended course. We suggest adding a new fifth category ‘Blended Learning Support’.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Education
Reference54 articles.
1. Bano, M., & Zowghi, D. (2015). A systematic review on the relationship between user involvement and system success. Information and Software Technology, 58, 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.06.011.
2. Behringer, R., Burri Gram-Hansen, S., Smith, C., Soosay, M., Mikulecká, J., Winther-Nielsen, N., … Herber, E. (2013). Persuasive technology for learning and teaching – The EuroPLOT project. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on EuroPLOT Persuasive Technology for Learning, Education and Teaching (pp. 3–7). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/624/1/IWEPLET13_01_BehringerEtAl_EuroPLOT.pdf.
3. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3.
4. Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y.
5. Bleumink, E. (2016). Trend report 2016—How technological trends enable customised education. Utrecht: SURFnet.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献