Abstract
Abstract
This paper introduces a computer application, based on The Alphabet Game, designed to assist students of all disciplines understand the key academic concepts used in their respective fields, with specific application to economics and the study of national accounts. This approach offers a valuable contribution, in view of the difficulties often encountered in presenting key national accounting concepts in a dynamic and appealing manner. Due to the flexibility of the application, it can also be adapted to other fields of knowledge requiring the use of specialized or technical concepts. To assess the game’s impact on enhancing learning, students of national accounts in economics were asked to assess their participation by means of an attitudinal survey focusing on motivation, quality of learning, and the effective use of time. The survey was completed by 60 students from two Spanish universities. The overall assessment of the game was strongly correlated with its contribution to the memorization of concepts, usefulness, and enjoy ability. The second evaluation assessed the impact of the game through measurement of its effect on academic performance, with students´ academic records related to the scores from both individual and group gameplay. The assessment was done using a multivariate analysis consisting of a set of semi-logarithmic regression models in which the exam score was the dependent variable and a combination of game results according to the version played (individual, group, or both) were the explanatory variables. All combinations indicated that the individual game is much more strongly related to overall academic performance than the group score. However, to better assess the game, a control group, homogeneous samples, or pre- and post-tests should be used. Finally, to improve the game’s impact on learning, it can be used as a compulsory scoring activity, or a badge system could be implemented. Nonetheless, this tool should only be understood as an inextricable part of other assessment and learning activities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Education
Reference56 articles.
1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
2. Becker, W.E. & Watts, M. (2001). Teaching economics at the start of the 21st century: Still chalk-and-talk. American Economic Review 446–451.
3. Begg, M., Dewhurst, D. & Macleod, H. (2005). Game-informed learning: Applying computer game processes to higher education. Innovate, 6(1). Available at http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=articleandid=176.
4. Benjamin, T. (2010). eGames: Is imagination the forgotten ingredient? Computers in Human Behavior, 3(26), 296–301.
5. Bodo, P. (2002). In-class simulations of the iterated prisoner’s dilemma game. The Journal of Economic Education, 3(33), 207–216.