Abstract
AbstractExisting studies have measured the effect of video-based feedback on student performance or satisfaction. Other issues are underacknowledged or merit further investigation. These include sociocultural aspects which may shape the design and implementation of video-based feedback, the ways students use technology to engage in feedback, and the processes through technology may transform learning. This study investigates the design and implementation of a video-annotated peer feedback activity to develop students’ presentation skills and knowledge of climate science. It explores how their use of a video annotation tool re-mediated established feedback practices and how the systematic analysis of contradictions in emerging practices informed the subsequent redesign and reimplementation of the approach. Employing a formative intervention design, the researchers intervened in the activity system of a first-year undergraduate education module to facilitate two cycles of expansive learning with an instructor and two groups of Hong Kong Chinese students (n = 97, n = 94) across two semesters. Instructor interviews, student surveys, and video annotation and system data were analysed using Activity Theory-derived criteria to highlight contradictions in each system and suggest how these could be overcome. The findings highlight the critical importance of active instructor facilitation; building student motivation by embedding social-affective support and positioning peer feedback as an integrated, formative process; and supporting students’ use of appropriate cognitive scaffolding to encourage their interactive, efficient use of the annotation tool. Conclusions: In a field dominated by experimental and quasi-experimental studies, this study reveals how an Activity Theory-derived research design and framework can be used to systemically analyse cycles of design and implementation of video-annotated peer feedback. It also suggests how the new activity system might be consolidated and generalised.
Funder
University Grants Committee
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Admiraal, W. (2014). Meaningful learning from practice: Web-based video in professional preparation programmes in university. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.813403
2. Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Dawson, P., & Boud, D. (2018). Conceptualising evaluative judgement for sustainable assessment in higher education. In Developing Evaluative Judgement in Higher Education (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 7–19). Routledge.
3. Anderson, K., Kennedy-Clark, S., & Galstaun, V. (2012). Using Video Feedback and Annotations to Develop ICT Competency in Pre-Service Teacher Education. Australian Association for Research in Education (NJ1).
4. Baran, E., AlZoubi, D., & Bahng, E. J. (2023). Using video enhanced mobile observation for peer-feedback in teacher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2180116
5. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2015). The change laboratory in higher education: Research-intervention using activity theory. In Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 141–168). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.