Indicators to assess preservice teachers’ digital competence in security: A systematic review

Author:

Torres-Hernández NormaORCID,Gallego-Arrufat María-Jesús

Abstract

AbstractThe goal of this review is to analyse the state of inquiry in the field of digital competence in security in initial teacher education, via indicators to assess preservice teachers’ digital competence in security, in order to help find opportunities to improve their competence level. Following the parameters defined in the PRISMA declaration, the review uses a bibliographic research methodology to explore the WoS, Scopus and ERIC databases. After a search identifying a sample of 31 scholarly articles published between 2010 and 2021, we analyse the information obtained using descriptive statistics and content analysis. The results show a predominance of empirical research in the European context. These studies are quantitative and tend to use questionnaires. Our conclusion proposes the need to train preservice teachers in data protection and privacy, searching for and using Internet images with authorship screening, use of open software programs, and respect for online communication norms, as well as ethical and responsible technology use. All of these issues are implicitly and transversally linked to the area of digital competence in security.

Funder

Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte

Universidad de Granada

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education

Reference71 articles.

1. Anderson, J. M. (2003). Why we need a new definition of information security. Computers & Security, 22(4), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4048(03)00407-3.

2. *Aristizabal, P., & Cruz, E. (2018). Development of digital competence in the Initial Teacher Education of Early Childhood Education. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 52, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i52.07.

3. Avello, R., López, R., Alvarez, H., Vázquez, S., Gómez, A., & Alpízar, S. (2014). Cuban experience in the formation of the Latin American professors including the technologies for education. Educación Médica Superior, 28(3),587–591. http://www.ems.sld.cu/index.php/ems/article/view/303.

4. Barrow, C., & Heywood-Everett, G. (2006). E-safety: The experience of English educational establishments: Summary and recommendations. Research: Reports & publications. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA). https://bit.ly/2Gz6aoD.

5. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2005). Systematic reviews of research in science education: Rigour or rigidity? International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323719.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3