Abstract
AbstractIn at-risk areas of social exclusion, a higher number of adolescents drop out of school. Dropout from compulsory education and early school leaving are associated with unemployment, poverty, and greater health problems, posing a significant threat to the youth’s development and wellbeing. Nevertheless, some students manage to pursue formal education even in high-risk areas, exhibiting resilience. Interwoven between the processes of risk and resilience, the students’ identity development plays a vital role. The present study aimed to analyze the learner identity of students who exhibit a resilience trajectory in areas at risk of social exclusion, and its relation to the degree of risk they face, their academic experience, and their gender. The sample consisted of 132 students from at-risk neighborhoods in Spain who successfully completed compulsory secondary education and continued beyond that level. To measure their academic selves, a modified version of the Twenty Statement Test (TST) was used, which was analyzed using a category system that included four dimensions: organization of the self, emotional valence, plane of action, and thematic reference. The results indicate the participants primarily used personal, positive, evaluative self-descriptions related to the academic world, mostly based on effort. A higher degree of risk was associated to more self-descriptions referring good relationships with others and class attendance, while higher academic experience was associated to more independent selves. The study also found several gender differences. The implications of these findings for research and social intervention in at-risk contexts are discussed.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Universidad de Sevilla
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Alegre, M. Á., & Benito, R. (2010). Los factores del abandono educativo temprano. España en el marco europeo [Factors in early school dropout. Spain in the European framework]. Revista de Educación, extra issue, 65–92. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/1208
2. Allen, R., Burgess, S., & Mayo, J. (2018). The teacher labour market, teacher turnover and disadvantaged schools: New evidence for England. Education Economics, 26(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1366425
3. Bayón-Calvo, S., Lucas‐García, J., & Gómez‐García, R. (2021). An endogenous analysis of early school leaving in Spain: The role of gender and regional inequalities. European Journal of Education, 56(3), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12461
4. Borman, G. D., & Overman, L. T. (2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1086/499748
5. Bruner, J. (1996). Frames for thinking: Ways of making meanings. In D. Olson, & N. Torrance (Eds.), Modes of thought: Explorations in culture and cognition (pp. 95–105). Cambridge University Press.