Abstract
AbstractNumber line estimation has been found to be strongly related to mathematical reasoning concurrently and longitudinally. However, the relationship between number line estimation and mathematical reasoning might differ according to children’s level of performance. This study investigates whether findings from previous studies that show number line estimation significantly predicting mathematical reasoning replicate, and whether this relationship holds across several points of the mathematical reasoning distribution. Participants include 324 Singaporean children (162 girls, Mage = 74.1 months, SDage = 4.0) in their second year of kindergarten who were assessed on the number line estimation task (0–10 and 0–100) and mathematical reasoning skills. The results replicate previous findings showing that higher accuracy on the number line estimation task is predictive of higher mathematical reasoning, for both the 0–10 and 0–100 number line. Quantile regressions show that performance on the number line task similarly predict mathematical reasoning across the performance distribution. Possible differences between the 0–10 and 0–100 number line’s predictive capacity are discussed.
Funder
Macquarie University
Singapore Ministry of Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference59 articles.
1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2018). Foundation to Year 10 curriculum (version 8.4). Available at https://australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum
2. Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27– 44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
3. Bartelet, D., Vaessen, A., Blomert, L., & Ansari, D. (2014). What basic number processing measures in kindergarten explain unique variability in first-grade arithmetic proficiency? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 117, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.010
4. Bull, R., Lee, K., & Muñez, D. (2021). Numerical magnitude understanding in kindergartners: A specific and sensitive predictor of later mathematical difficulties? Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 911–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000640
5. Clarke, B., Strand Cary, M. G., Shanley, L., & Sutherland, M. (2020). Exploring the promise of a number line assessment to help identify students at-risk in mathematics. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418791738
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献