Instructional support in inquiry-based elementary school science classes: how does it relate to students’ science content knowledge and academic language proficiency?
-
Published:2022-12-03
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0256-2928
-
Container-title:European Journal of Psychology of Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Psychol Educ
Author:
Heppt BirgitORCID, Henschel SofieORCID, Hardy IloncaORCID, Gabler KatrinORCID
Abstract
AbstractInquiry-based science instruction has been proposed as an optimal learning environment for language-integrated teaching. While its potential for developing both content knowledge and language skills has been shown for students with limited language proficiency, research focusing on mainstream classrooms has mainly considered domain-specific learning. Despite the effectiveness of inquiry-based science instruction for student outcomes, research on the role of specific aspects of instructional quality is limited. Addressing this research gap, the present study investigates the relationship between teachers’ instructional support during inquiry-based science classes and elementary school students’ learning gains in science content knowledge and academic language proficiency. Multilevel regression analyses are based on data from 459 German elementary school students from Grades 3 and 4 who participated in a longitudinal intervention study that took place over one school year. Our findings indicate a strong impact of students’ prior knowledge on learning outcomes and compositional effects for the language-related measures. Relations between teachers’ instructional support, as measured by the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Pianta et al., 2008), and students’ learning outcomes did not emerge. In interpreting the results, the overall mediocre quality of teachers’ instructional support needs to be considered.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference107 articles.
1. Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., Macaskill, G., Haldane, S. A., & Sun, X. S. (2015). ACER ConQuest: Generalised item response modelling software. (Version 4) [Computer software]. Australian Council for Educational Research. 2. Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., Cloney, D., & Wilson, M. R. (2020). ACER ConQuest 5. Generalised item response modelling software. (Version 5) [Computer software]. Australian Council for Educational Research. 3. Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System—Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492 4. Alvarez, L., Catechis, N., Chu, H., Hamburger, L., Herpin, S. A., & Walqui, A. (2012). Quality teaching for English learners (QTEL) impact study. WestEd. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3229.6320 5. Ardasheva, Y., Newcomer, S. N., Firestone, J. B., & Lamb, R. L. (2017). Mediation in the relationship among EL status, vocabulary, and science reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(6), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1175407
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|