Reading for entertainment or information reception? Gender differences in reading preferences and their impact on text-type-specific reading competences in adult readers

Author:

Thums KathrinORCID,Artelt Cordula,Wolter Ilka

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims at exploring gender differences in text-type-specific reading competences via readers’ gender-specific reading preferences. Women were expected to read more often for the sake of entertainment (entertainment preference), whereas men were expected to read more often to gain information (information preference). We further assumed that individuals who read for entertainment would have higher reading competence in fictional literary texts compared with non-fictional informational texts, and vice versa for individuals who read to gain information. The analysis was based on a sample of 830 adults between 19 and 71 years (M = 31.04; SD = 12.53) from a pilot study of the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). A structural equation model confirmed that women and men show different reading preferences during leisure time. The preference to read for entertainment was predictive for reading competence in literary texts; however, the preference to read for information had positive effects on reading competence in both informational and literary texts.

Funder

Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsverläufe e.V.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference46 articles.

1. Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., & Wilson, M. R. (2015). ACER ConQuest: Generalised item response modelling software [computer software]. Version 4. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

2. Allison, P. D. (2009). Missing data. Sage university papers quantitative applications in the social sciences: Vol. 136. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publ.

3. Artelt, C., McElvany, N., Christmann, U., Richter, T., Groeben, N., Köster, J., et al. (2007). Förderung von Lesekompetenz - Expertise [promotion of reading competence - an expertise]. Bildungsforschung: Vol. 17. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.

4. Artelt, C., Naumann, J., & Schneider, W. (2010). Lesemotivation und Lernstrategien [reading motivation and learning strategies]. In E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, M. Prenzel, et al. (Eds.), PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt (pp. 73–112). Münster: Waxmann.

5. Artelt, C., Schiefele, U., & Schneider, W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173188.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3