When do Physicians and Nurses Start Communication about Advance Care Planning? A Qualitative Study at an Acute Care Hospital in Japan

Author:

Tsuruwaka Mari,Ikeguchi Yoshiko,Nakamura Megumi

Abstract

AbstractAlthough advance care planning (ACP) can lead to more patient-centered care, the communication around it can be challenging in acute care hospitals, where saving a life or shortening hospitalization is important priorities. Our qualitative study in an acute care hospital in Japan revealed when specifically physicians and nurses start communication to facilitate ACP. Seven physicians and 19 nurses responded to an interview request, explaining when ACP communication was initiated with 32 patients aged 65 or older. Our qualitative approach employed descriptive analysis to identify major themes, which included “initiation by patients” and “initiation by healthcare professionals.” In the latter case, seven specific triggers were identified: (1) when the patients’ medical condition changed in terms of symptom relief, (2) when the patients’ medical condition changed in terms of prognostic prediction, (3) when serious events occurred, (4) when a choice of treatment was presented, (5) when the location for end-of-life care was chosen, (6) when the patients’ cognitive function deteriorated, and (7) when serious events settled down. Within this group of healthcare professionals, physicians were more focused on changes in their patients’ medical condition, whereas nurses focused more on their patients’ desire for a long-term perspective. Nurses encouraged patients to consider ACP themselves, which developed into an approach to respect patients’ autonomy. In acute care hospitals, it appeared to be desirable to have an early discussion where patients could understand the significance ACP, which would matter even after their discharge from the hospital.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Health(social science)

Reference39 articles.

1. Bakitas, Marie, J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom, Lisa Jackson, Jennifer Frost, Margaret F. Bishop, and Zhongze Li. 2016. ‘There were more decisions and more options than just yes or no’: evaluating a decision aid for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. Palliative & Supportive Care 12: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951516000596.

2. Brown, Margaret, Mary A. Brooksbank, Teresa A. Burgess, Mary Young, and Gregory B. Crawford. 2012. The experience of patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and advance care-planning: a South Australian perspective. Journal of Law and Medicine 20 (2): 400–409.

3. Dixon, Josie, and Martin Knapp. 2018. Whose job? The staffing of advance care planning support in twelve international healthcare organizations: a qualitative interview study. BMC Palliative Care 17 (1): 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0333-1.

4. Epstein, A.S., E. Shuk, E.M. O'Reilly, K.A. Gary, and A.E. Volandes. 2015. ‘We have to discuss it’: cancer patients’ advance care planning impressions following educational information about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Psycho-Oncology 24 (12): 1767–1773. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3786.

5. Fahner, Jurrianne C., Alexandra J.M. Beunders, Agnes van der Heide, Judith A.C. Rietjens, Maaike M. Vanderschuren, Johannes J.M. van Delden, and Marijke C. Kars. 2018. Interventions guiding advance care planning conversations: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 20 (3): 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.014.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3