Association between physicians’ characteristics and their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding advance care planning: A cross-sectional study

Author:

Sakamoto Ayaka1,Inokuchi Ryota1,Iwagami Masao1,Hanari Kyoko1,Tamiya Nanako1

Affiliation:

1. University of Tsukuba

Abstract

Abstract Background: Despite physicians’ vital role in advance care planning, a limited number of physicians practice it. This study assessed factors associated with physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding advance care planning. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from an anonymous survey conducted by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Questionnaires were mailed to 4500 physicians in November and December 2022. Data from 1260 respondents were analyzed. Results: Of the respondents, 46.4%, 77.0%, and 82.0% reported good knowledge of advance care planning, agreed with promoting it, and with its provision by medical/care staff, respectively. Male physicians were significantly less likely to support advance care planning (odds ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.35–0.84) or agree to its provision by medical/care staff (odds ratio: 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.29–0.78) but significantly more likely to practice it (odds ratio: 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–2.36). Physicians specialized in surgery or internal/general/palliative medicine were more knowledgeable about advance care planning and more likely to practice it. Physicians working in clinics were significantly less knowledgeable (odds ratio: 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.25–0.44) about advance care planning and less likely to support it (odds ratio: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.27–0.50), agree with its provision by medical/care staff (odds ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.39–0.75), or to practice it (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.12–0.22). Conclusions: Physicians working in clinics had less knowledge of advance care planning, less supportive attitudes, and less likely to practice it. Knowledge, attitudes and practice also varied by gender and specialty. Interventions should target physicians working in clinics.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3