Mapping out the Trajectory of Islamic Perspectives on Neuroethics

Author:

Noorfuad NoorinaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe advancements of medical technology incited multi-disciplinary discussions with regard to its ethical implications. Within the neuroscientific domain, the term ‘neuroethics’ has gained prominence over recent years. However, the contributions of religious perspectives in the nascent field of neuroethics are particularly few. The scarce literature on Islamic perspectives on neuroethics merely questioned its importance and introduced a sharia-based framework that can be implemented. Building upon this, the possible trajectories of Islamic perspectives on neuroethics can be mapped out by tapping into several issues within Islamic bioethics, such as cloning and genomics. Topics such as these are deliberated through the collective discussions by contemporary Muslim scholars and biomedical scientists, thus producing well-informed dialogues and decisions. Building upon these may assist in developing further the Islamic perspectives on issues within neuroethics. This lays the groundwork for all the stakeholders involved in advance, in order to predict and prevent potential harms and challenges.

Funder

Hamad bin Khalifa University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Health (social science)

Reference18 articles.

1. Al-Delaimy, Wael K. 2012. Ethical concepts and future challenges of neuroimaging: An Islamic perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3): 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9386-3.

2. Baharuddin, Azizan, Mohd Noor Musa, and S.M. Saifuddeen S.M. Salleh. 2016. A preliminary insight into an Islamic mechanism for neuroethics. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 23 (1): 1–3.

3. Carter, Adrian, Linda J. Richards, Deborah Apthorp, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi, David R. Badcock, Bernard Balleine, John M. Bekkers, et al. 2019. A neuroethics framework for the Australian brain initiative. Neuron 101 (3): 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.004.

4. Coppola, Federica. 2018. Mapping the brain to predict antisocial behaviour: new frontiers in neurocriminology, ‘new’challenges for criminal justice. UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence-Special Issue 1 (1): 103–126.

5. Davis, Kevin A. 2017. The brain defense: murder in Manhattan and the dawn of neuroscience in America’s courtrooms. New York, NY: Penguin.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3