The Tower of Babel in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Author:

Schneeberger DavidORCID,Röttger RichardORCID,Cabitza FedericoORCID,Campagner AndreaORCID,Plass MarkusORCID,Müller HeimoORCID,Holzinger AndreasORCID

Abstract

AbstractAs machine learning (ML) has emerged as the predominant technological paradigm for artificial intelligence (AI), complex black box models such as GPT-4 have gained widespread adoption. Concurrently, explainable AI (XAI) has risen in significance as a counterbalancing force. But the rapid expansion of this research domain has led to a proliferation of terminology and an array of diverse definitions, making it increasingly challenging to maintain coherence. This confusion of languages also stems from the plethora of different perspectives on XAI, e.g. ethics, law, standardization and computer science. This situation threatens to create a “tower of Babel” effect, whereby a multitude of languages impedes the establishment of a common (scientific) ground. In response, this paper first maps different vocabularies, used in ethics, law and standardization. It shows that despite a quest for standardized, uniform XAI definitions, there is still a confusion of languages. Drawing lessons from these viewpoints, it subsequently proposes a methodology for identifying a unified lexicon from a scientific standpoint. This could aid the scientific community in presenting a more unified front to better influence ongoing definition efforts in law and standardization, often without enough scientific representation, which will shape the nature of AI and XAI in the future.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference60 articles.

1. AI Standards Hub: Output from workshop on ISO/IEC standards for AI transparency and explainability. https://aistandardshub.org/forums/topic/output-from-workshop-on-iso-iec-standards-for-ai-transparency/-and-explainability/

2. Beining, L.: Vertrauenswürdige KI durch Standards? (2020). https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/files/herausforderungen-standardisierung-ki.pdf

3. Bibal, A., Lognoul, M., de Streel, A., Frénay, B.: Legal requirements on explainability in machine learning. Artif. Intell. Law 29, 149–169 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09270-4

4. Bomhard, D., Merkle, M.: Europäische KI-Verordnung. Recht Digit. 1(6), 276–283 (2021)

5. Bordt, S., Finck, M., Raidl, E., von Luxburg, U.: Post-hoc explanations fail to achieve their purpose in adversarial contexts. In: FAccT 2022: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 891–905. ACM, New York (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533153

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3