Controllable AI - An Alternative to Trustworthiness in Complex AI Systems?

Author:

Kieseberg PeterORCID,Weippl Edgar,Tjoa A. Min,Cabitza Federico,Campagner Andrea,Holzinger AndreasORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe release of ChatGPT to the general public has sparked discussions about the dangers of artificial intelligence (AI) among the public. The European Commission’s draft of the AI Act has further fueled these discussions, particularly in relation to the definition of AI and the assignment of risk levels to different technologies. Security concerns in AI systems arise from the need to protect against potential adversaries and to safeguard individuals from AI decisions that may harm their well-being. However, ensuring secure and trustworthy AI systems is challenging, especially with deep learning models that lack explainability. This paper proposes the concept of Controllable AI as an alternative to Trustworthy AI and explores the major differences between the two. The aim is to initiate discussions on securing complex AI systems without sacrificing practical capabilities or transparency. The paper provides an overview of techniques that can be employed to achieve Controllable AI. It discusses the background definitions of explainability, Trustworthy AI, and the AI Act. The principles and techniques of Controllable AI are detailed, including detecting and managing control loss, implementing transparent AI decisions, and addressing intentional bias or backdoors. The paper concludes by discussing the potential applications of Controllable AI and its implications for real-world scenarios.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference24 articles.

1. Asimov, I.: Three laws of robotics. Asimov, I. Runaround 2 (1941)

2. Bengio, Y., Lecun, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning for AI. Commun. ACM 64(7), 58–65 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3448250

3. Bubeck, S., et al.: Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv:2303.12712 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712

4. Cabitza, F., et al.: Quod erat demonstrandum?-towards a typology of the concept of explanation for the design of explainable AI. Expert Syst. Appl. 213(3), 118888 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118888

5. European Commission: Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. European Commission (2021). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:52021PC0206. proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, No. COM/2021/206 final

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3