Author:
Armijos M. Teresa,Acosta Luis David,Calder Eliza S.,Gaviria William,Giraldo Daniela,Pineda Jaime,Rabe Carolina,Sanaguano Pablo,Zambrano Lina Andrea
Abstract
AbstractThe chapter aims to contribute to the important endeavour of decolonising Disaster Risk Studies, and more broadly, Development Studies, by focusing on the researcher and how they (and therefore the knowledge they produce) change with and through the emotions embedded in the research process (Dauder and Trejo, 2020). Through a series of individual narratives, we explore how the researcher's multiplicity of positionalities are transformed by the research process in its circular relationship with emotions that emerge and, in turn, inform it. In doing so, we recognise the plural forms of knowledge production (Escobar, 2003) that transcend the realm of 'thinking' to acknowledge ethical, emotional and relational commitments in the research process (Cahill 2007b). We argue the this is a step towards both admitting vulnerability and assuming power and knowledge in new forms, while also challenging dualisms often present in Western thinking and their associated hierarchies and hegemonies (Dauder and Trejo 2021; Cahill 2007b).
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference34 articles.
1. Appadurai, A. (2006). The Right to Research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 167–177.
2. Armijos Burneo, T., & Ramirez Loaiza, V. (2021). Encuentros y Desencuentros con la Fórmula del Riesgo y los Desastres: Tiempos para el Cuidado y la Reciprocidad. REDER, 5(2), 19–35.
3. Brown, L., & Strega, S. (Eds.). (2015). Research as Resistance: Revisiting Critical, Indigenous, and Anti-Oppressive Approaches. Canadian Scholars’ Press.
4. Cadag, J. R. (2022). Decolonising Disasters. Disasters, 46, 1121–1126.
5. Cahill, C. (2007a). Repositioning Ethical Commitments: Participatory Action Research as a Relational Praxis of Social Change. ACME, 6(3), 360–373.