Abstract
AbstractInternationally, curriculum policy is often shaped through either content-based or competence-based curriculum approaches. Considering these two framings of educational policy discourse and curriculum policy making, this chapter compares and contrasts Bildung and twenty-first century competences as outcome(s) of education by examining the latest OECD and European Union (EU) education frameworks and visions and the latest curriculum reform agendas in the national contexts of Norway and Kosovo. The chapter relies on qualitative document analysis methodologically, and it is theoretically framed by non-affirmative education theory, critical-constructive didaktik and curriculum ideologies. Through a comparative reading of aims of education promoted by the OECD, the EU, Norway, and Kosovo frameworks, it is found that the OECD is recalibrating the education goals towards individual and collective well-being, the EU maintains the focus on mastery of key competences for lifelong learning, Norway promotes its dual mission of schooling towards education and Bildung, and Kosovo aims at mastery of key competences introduced in the latest curriculum reform. It is concluded that a Bildung-oriented curriculum policy could provide for a more holistic view of the individual and human development as it gives more agency to the individuals to shape their lives in their own terms and resume responsibility accordingly.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference48 articles.
1. Anderson-Levitt, K. (2017). Global flows of competence-based approaches in primary and secondary education. Cahiers de la Recherche Sur l’éducation et les Savoirs, 16, 47–72.
2. Anderson-Levitt, K., & Gardinier, M. P. (2021). Introduction contextualising global flows of competency-based education: Polysemy, hybridity and silences. Comparative Education, 57(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1852719
3. Bachmann, K., Hörmann, B., & Sivesind, K. (2021). Bildung: Alive and allowed? A critical study of work plan practices in Norwegian schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1936191
4. Benner, D. (this volume). On affirmativity and non-affirmativity in the context of theories of education and Bildung. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Non-affirmative theory of education and Bildung. Springer.
5. Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (Eds.). (2014). The nordic education model. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-7125-3