Author:
Pospiech Gesche,Geyer Marie-Annette
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference25 articles.
1. Angell, C., Guttersrud, O., Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88, 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10141
2. Bagno, E., Berger, H., & Eylon, B.-S. (2008). Meeting the challenge of students’ understanding of formulae in high-school physics: A learning tool. Physics Education, 43, 75.
3. de Ataide, A. R. P., & Greca, I. M. (2013). Epistemic views of the relationship between physics and mathematics: Its influence on the approach of undergraduate students to problem solving. Science and Education, 22, 1405–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9492-2
4. Geyer, M.-A., & Pospiech, G. (2016). Diagramme im Physikunterricht. Hintergründe und Anregungen zur Förderung des Umgangs mit Diagrammen. In Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht Physik. Mathematik im Physikunterricht 27 (153/154) (pp. 36–40).
5. Geyer, M.-A., & Pospiech, G. (2019). An explorative laboratory study: Changing representations of functional dependencies in physics class of lower secondary school. In McLoughlin, et al. (Eds.), Bridging research and practice in science education. Selected Papers from the ESERA 2017 Conference (Vol. 6, pp. 35–50). Contributions from Science Education Research. Springer.