1. Alberto, R., Bakker, A., Walker-van Aalst, O., Boon, P., & Drijvers, P. (2019). Networking theories in design research: An embodied instrumentation case study in trigonometry. In U. T. Jankvist, M. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3088–3095). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
2. Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245–274.
3. Artigue, M. (2010). The future of teaching and learning mathematics with digital technologies. In C. Hoyles, & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain. The 17th ICMI study (pp. 463–475). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_23
4. Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9163-z
5. Bakos, S., & Sinclair, S. (2019). Exploring the semiotic potential of TouchTimes with primary teachers. In J. Novotná, & H. Moraová (Eds.), Proceedings of international symposium of elementary mathematics teaching: Opportunities in learning and teaching elementary mathematics (pp. 53–62). Charles University, Faculty of Education.