Author:
Beiting-Parrish Magdalen,Verkuilen Jay,McCluskey Sydne,Everson Howard,Wladis Claire
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference18 articles.
1. Bauer, D., Holzer, M., Kopp, V., & Fischer, M. R. (2010). Pick-N multiple choice-exams: A comparison of scoring algorithms. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9256-1
2. Brassil, C. E., & Couch, B. A. (2019). Multiple-true-false questions reveal more thoroughly the complexity of student thinking than multiple-choice questions: A Bayesian item response model comparison. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0169-0
3. Glasnapp, D. G., & Poggio, J. P. (1994, April). Psychometric characteristics of the multiple-correct multiple-choice item. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans.
4. Grunert, M. L., Raker, J. R., Murphy, K. L., & Holme, T. A. (2013). Polytomous versus dichotomous scoring on multiple-choice examinations: Development of a rubric for rating partial credit. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(10), 1310–1315. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400247d
5. Lakin, J. (2014). Test directions as a critical component of test design: Best practices and the impact of examinee characteristics. Educational Assessment, 19, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.869448