Abstract
AbstractAlready in the 1970s, researchers in linguistics and psychology became interested in understanding how written language production worked, why students’ texts ended up in a specific way, and whether writing instruction could be improved by an increased understanding of students’ actual activities during writing - what happens “behind the scenes”. They observed writing processes through video-recordings and think-aloud protocols, both of which required laborious manual analyses, but with the advent of affordable computers in the 1990s keystroke logging was developed. Keystroke logging records all keystrokes and mouse movements and provide them with a time stamp to allow playback and analyses. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the reader to the concept of keystroke logging, explain briefly how it works, and give an overview of currently available software. First, we provide a short historical background. We then move into the core idea and functionality of keystroke logging in general before turning to descriptions of specific pieces of software. We summarise similarities and differences, aiming to show that choice of software should be governed by the research question. Finally, we discuss research that uses keystroke logging as a research tool, and provide examples of research about keystroke logging as a pedagogical tool.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference53 articles.
1. Bowen, N. (2019). Unfolding choices in digital writing: A functional perspective on the language of academic revisions. Journal of Writing Research, 10(3), 465–498. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.10.03.03
2. Breetvelt, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how? Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1202_2
3. Carl, M. (2012). Translog - II: A program for recording user activity data for empirical reading and writing research. In Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
4. Chukarev-Hudalainen, E. (2019). Empowering Automated Writing Evaluation with Keystroke Logging. In E. Lindgren, Y. Knospe, & Sullivan, K.P. (Eds.) Observing writing: Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 125–142). Brill Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004392526_007
5. Dux Speltz, E., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2021). The effect of automated fluency-focused feedback on text production. Journal of Writing Research, 13(2), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2021.13.02.02
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Chapter 8. Using keystroke logging for studying L2 writing processes;Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes;2023-10-15