Abstract
AbstractThis chapter focuses on the challenges of implementing mission-oriented policies (MOPs) in developing countries, with a particular emphasis on the Brazilian shipbuilding sector. The aim is to analyze the difficulties associated with setting MOPs and their impact on market creation and innovation. Despite the implementation of comprehensive institutional arrangements to foster technological and industrial development, the sector’s progress has been hindered by coordination uncertainties and high capability-building costs. The policies initially provided a boost, but the industry ultimately failed to catch up with international competitors. The article highlights the blurred boundary between policy expectations for market creation and the practical limitations of building a thriving industry.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference61 articles.
1. Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385–406.
2. Aldieri, L., Sena, V., & Vinci, C. P. (2018). Domestic R&D spillovers and absorptive capacity: Some evidence for the US, Europe, and Japan. International Journal of Production Economics, 198(1), 38–49.
3. Alves, A. C. (2015). Industrial Organization Dynamics: Bounded Capabilities and Technological Interfaces of the Brazilian Shipbuilding and Offshore Industry. Doctoral Dissertation. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
4. Alves, A. C., Vonortas, N. S., & Zawislak, P. A. (2021). Mission-oriented policy for innovation and the fuzzy boundary of market creation: The Brazilian shipbuilding case. Science and Public Policy, 48(1), 80–92.
5. Arrow, K. J. (1962), Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for R&D. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (pp. 609–625). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献