Abstract
AbstractOne of the key functions of global Technology Assessment is to promote multilateral Science Technology and Innovation cooperation, in order to resolve current global challenges. In this chapter, we identify TA’s role in the existing STI multilateral system and localize it within the existing global decision-making structures. We describe a wide spectrum of TA methodologies that United Nations and multilateral agencies employ, to analyse new and emerging technologies and provide policy input. We further concentrate on the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, where TA is specifically commissioned as an aspiration for the achievement of its development goals and we further provide examples of TA projects within the organisation’s remit. Moreover, we explore the relationship between the Sustainable Development Goals and TA, while offering realistic options to overcoming the numerous challenges that TA is faced with when applied in developing countries. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the four models of global TA and the significance of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as a role model for an independent and effective global TA.
Funder
Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Rathenau Instituut
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference30 articles.
1. Beck, S., Esguerra, A., Borie, M., & Chilvers, J. (2014). Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise. The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23, 80–87.
2. Buetschi, D., Carius, R., Decker, M., Gram, S., Grunwald, A., Machleidt, P., Steyaert, S., & van Est, R. (2004). The practice of TA: Science, interaction and communication. In M. Decker & M. Ladikas (Eds.), Bridges between science, society and policy; technology assessment - Methods and impacts (pp. 13–55). Springer.
3. Chen, Y. (2018). Comparing north-south technology transfer and south-south technology transfer: The technology transfer impact of Ethiopian wind farms. Energy Policy, 116, 1–9.
4. Corbera, E., et al. (2016). Patterns of authorship in the IPCC working group III report. Nature Climate Change, 6, 94–100.
5. Decker, M., & Ladikas, M. (Eds.). (2004). Bridges between science, society and policy. Technology assessment methods and impacts. Springer.