Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES

Published:2014-05-30 Issue:2 Volume:23 Page:80-87
ISSN:0940-5550
Container-title:GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society
language:en
Short-container-title:GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society

Author:

Beck Silke,Borie Maud,Chilvers Jason,Esguerra Alejandro,Heubach Katja,Hulme Mike,Lidskog Rolf,Lövbrand Eva,Marquard Elisabeth,Miller Clark,Nadim Tahani,Neßhöver Carsten,Settele Josef,Turnhout Esther,Vasileiadou Eleftheria,Görg Christoph

Abstract

The role and design of global expert organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) needs rethinking. Acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all model does not exist, we suggest a reflexive turn that implies treating the governance of expertise as a matter of political contestation.

Publisher

Oekom Publishers GmbH

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cited by 195 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Climate storylines as a tool for interdisciplinary dialogue on risk decision-making: Analyzing a severe drought in southeastern South America;Environmental Science & Policy;2024-10

2. A roadmap to equity in pandemic preparedness, prevention and response;Journal of Global Health;2024-08-23

3. More than policy neutral: Justifying the power of science-policy interfaces through legitimacy;Earth System Governance;2024-08

4. Strategies for integrating scientific evidence in water policy and law in the face of uncertainty;Science of The Total Environment;2024-06

5. Ecologies of co-production in the Anthropocene;Progress in Environmental Geography;2024-04-25