Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference19 articles.
1. Buck, J. R., Wage, K. E., Hjalmarson, M. A., & Nelson, J. K. (2007). Comparing student understanding of signals and systems using a concept inventory, a traditional exam and interviews. In 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference – Global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports, SIG1–SIG6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2007.4418043
2. Coppens, P., Van den Bossche, J., & De Cock, M. (2017). Student understanding of phase shifts, frequency and bode plots. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 54(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720916680373
3. Cramer, K. (2003). Using a translation model for curriculum development and classroom instruction. In R. A. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 449–463). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Engelbrecht, J., Bergsten, C., & Kågesten, O. (2012). Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in the engineering curriculum: Student conceptions and performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 138–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00045.x
5. Faulkner, B., Earl, K., & Herman, G. (2019). Mathematical maturity for engineering students. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00083-8