Bureaucratic, Professional and Managerial Power in University Tenure Track Recruitment

Author:

Vellamo Tea,Kosonen Jonna,Siekkinen Taru,Pekkola Elias

Abstract

AbstractIn this chapter, our interest lies in analysing the different powers in recruitment and, particularly, how they are manifested in the new tenure track model in technical fields in Finland. Traditionally, recruitment in higher education has mostly relied on the bureaucratic application of processes and on academics, representing professional power, evaluating academic merit. The new university legislation, granting universities more autonomy in recruiting, has allowed the development of increasingly strategic recruitment models. The novel tenure track recruitment criteria exceed traditional notions of individual merits to include assessments of the strategic visions of universities and departments. We see the use of the tenure track model as a shift both in the recruitment for identity building related to the technical university’s strategy and as a shift in using more managerial power in recruitment. We use a case study approach where we look at recruitment in a similar field in two different kinds of universities utilising tenure track, and we examine how bureaucratic, managerial and professional powers are manifested in the processes. The comparisons are used to highlight the powers in the tenure track process in a technical university.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference49 articles.

1. Act on Equality between Women and Men, 609. (1986). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1986/en19860609_20160915.pdf

2. Act on the Openness of Government Activities, 621. (1999). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990621_20150907.pdf

3. Allen, D. (2003). Organisational climate and strategic change in higher education: Organisational insecurity. Higher Education, 46, 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024445024385

4. Arnhold, N., Pekkola, E., Püttmann, V., & Sursock, A. (2018). Focus on performance—World Bank support to higher education in Latvia (Vol. 3): Academic careers (English). World Bank Group.

5. Bruun, N., & von Koskull, A. (2012). Työoikeuden perusteet. (2nd ed.) (Juridica; No. 4). Talentum.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3