The Quality of Student Perception Questionnaires: A Systematic Review

Author:

Bijlsma Hannah

Abstract

AbstractStudent perceptions of teaching are promising for measuring the quality of teaching in primary and secondary education. However, generating valid and reliable measurements when using a student perception questionnaire (SPQ) is not self-evident. Many authors have pointed to issues that need to be taken into account when developing, selecting, and using an SPQ in order to generate valid and reliable scores. In this study, 22 SPQs that met the inclusion criteria used in the literature search were systematically evaluated by two reviewers. The reviewers were most positive about the theoretical basis of the SPQs and about the quality of the SPQ materials. According to their evaluation, most SPQs also had acceptable reliability and construct validity. However, norm information about the quality rating measures was often lacking and few sampling specifications were provided. Information about the features of the SPQs, if available, was also often not presented in an accessible way by the instrument developers (e.g., in a user manual), making it difficult for potential SPQ users to obtain an overview of the qualities of available SPQs in order to decide which SPQs best fit their own context and intended use. It is suggested to create an international database of SPQs and to develop a standardized evaluation framework to evaluate the SPQ qualities in order to provide potential users with the information they need to make a well-informed choice of an SPQ.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference58 articles.

1. Alkharusi, H. (2011). Development and datametric properties of a scale measuring students’ perceptions of the classroom assessment environment. International Journal of Instruction, 4, 105–120.

2. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), and National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

3. Bechger, T., Hemker, B., & Maris., G. (2009). Over het gebruik van continue normering [About the use of continuous standardization]. CITO.

4. Bell, C., & Aldridge, J. M. (2014). Investigating the use of student perception data for teacher reflection and classroom improvement. Learning Environments Research, 17, 371–388.

5. Bell, C., Dobbelaer, M. J., Klette, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2018). Qualities of classroom observation systems: School effectiveness and school improvement. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ll/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014?scroll=top&needAccess=true. Accessed 6 Aug 2020.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Teacher-student relationship and teaching styles in primary education: A model of analysis;Journal of Professional Capital and Community;2023-06-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3