Abstract
AbstractAccording to widespread literature, platforms are considered infrastructures of contemporary society. While we are accustomed to thinking of infrastructure in tangible terms, in a world where analogical and digital appear increasingly indistinguishable, platforms too become like bridges that support economic, cultural, social exchanges, and more. Assuming this characteristic, however, the fundamental question remains: what is the epistemological advantage in considering platforms as infrastructures? In this chapter, we will delve into what it means to conceive of platforms as infrastructures from a political perspective, and ultimately in terms of power. We will explore the relationship between platforms and State institutions (sometimes marked by collaboration, at other times by competition), and focus on relatively novel sources of power of digital giants, specifically algorithmic management and data extraction: through these capacities, platforms achieve and wield a form of governmental power, as understood in Foucauldian terms. Ultimately, rather than justifying the role of platforms as infrastructures, we will examine the political power that this position affords them, investigating the so-called “infrastructural power” they extend over society, and recalling the forms of resistance that counteract it.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference52 articles.
1. Allen, B. (1997). The logistics revolution and transportation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 553.
2. Anastasiadou, I. (2008). Constructing iron Europe. Transnationalism and railways in the interbellum. Amsterdam University Press.
3. Arboleda, M. (2020). Planetary mine. Verso.
4. Braun, B., & Whatmore, S. (2010). Political matter: Technoscience. Minnesota University Press.
5. Bonacich, E., & Wilson, J. (2008). Getting the goods. Ports, labor and the logistics revolution. Cornell UP.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献