Author:
Camarinha-Matos Luis M.,Ferrada Filipa,Oliveira Ana Inês
Abstract
AbstractNew organizational forms are emerging today at all levels of society, and more and more research is conducted in dynamic collaborative networks or ecosystems. Unlike traditional research centers, these new types of organization are very dynamic, with fluid boundaries, and volatile in terms of membership. This characteristic requires that more attention be paid to research ethics and RRI. This work reports on an implementation process carried out in a research and innovation ecosystem according to the principles and guidelines proposed by the ETHNA project. The process, its barriers and drivers are described, and finally, learned lessons and recommendations are presented.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference24 articles.
1. Burget, M., Bardone, E., Pedaste, M.: Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review. Sci. Eng. Ethics 23(1), 1–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1
2. Gwizdała, J., Śledzik, K.: Responsible research and innovation in the context of university technology transfer. Folia Oeconomica Acta Universitas Lodzensis 2(328) (2017). https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.328.04
3. Liu, J., Zhang, G., Lv, X., Li, J.: Discovering the landscape and evolution of responsible research and innovation (RRI): science mapping based on bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 14, 8944 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148944
4. Bouter, L.: What research institutions can do to foster research integrity. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26(4), 2363–2369 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00178-5
5. United Nations: Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (2015). Accessed 6 Apr 2021
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献