Evaluation of RRI Institutionalisation Endeavours: Specificities, Drivers, Barriers, and Good Practices Based on a Multi-stakeholder Consultation and Living Lab Experiences

Author:

Szüdi Gábor,Lampert Dietmar,Hajdinjak Marko,Asenova Desislava,Alves Elsa,Bidstrup Maya Vestergaard

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this study is to provide research performing organisations and research funding organisations (RPOs and RFOs) with practical advice on how to engage in an effective RRI institutionalisation. Therefore, we first looked at the most relevant drivers, challenges, and the most beneficial good practices potentially affecting RRI institutionalisation within RPOs and RFOs across Europe through a multi-step, multi-stakeholder consultation approach. The broad set of drivers, barriers and good practices identified at the consultation was methodologically divided into structural, cultural and interchange-related aspects. These aspects can theoretically exercise a positive or negative impact on the RRI institutionalisation, and their validity was tested in Living Labs by six organisations. By categorising these six implementers in terms of RRI readiness we were able to identify key factors and describe specific organisational circumstances conducive to a successful adoption and use of RRI principles and practices for three organisational types of RPOs/RFOs.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference12 articles.

1. Steen, M., Nauta, J., Gaasterland, R., Ogier, S.: Institutionalizing responsible research and innovation: case studies. In: Bitran, I., Conn, S., Huizingh, E., Kokshagina, O., Torkkeli, M., Tynnhammar, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the XXIX ISPIM Innovation Conference: Innovation, The Name of the Game (2018) ISPIM

2. González-Esteban, E.: The ETHNA system and support tools. In: Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice, Springer, Cham (2023)

3. Evans, P., Schuurman, D., Ståhlbröst, A., Vervoort, K.: Living Lab Methodology Handbook. European Network of Living Labs (2017). https://issuu.com/enoll/docs/366265932-u4iot-LivingLabmethodology-handbook. Accessed 15 Mar 2023

4. Häberlein, L., Mönig, J.M., Hövel, P.: Mapping stakeholders and scoping involvement – a guide for HEFRCs. Project Deliverable, Ethics Governance System for RRI in Higher Education, Funding and Research Centres (2021). https://ethnasystem.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/ETHNA_2021_d3.1-stakeholdermapping_2110011.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2023

5. Popa, E., Blok, V., Wesselink, R.: Social Labs for Quadruple Helix Collaborations – A manual for designing and implementing social Labs in collaboration between industry, academia, policy and citizen. Project Deliverable, RiConfigure (2018). http://riconfigure.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/D01.2_Social-Lab-Methodology-Manual_v2.0.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2023

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3